| . |
Safe operation
(What?) |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
| . |
Download |
|
|
 |
At each stage in the life of a plant, the same approach
is used as in applying the defense in-depth principle. First, the
requirements are announced to the parties responsible for the design,
to the vendor or the operators organization. These organizations
have to follow and to be absolutly in accordance with the requirements.
A system is then organized to monitor the discrepancies
between requirements and performance. Means of action are implemented
to correct the differences.
This material is intended for operators, therefore
two whole chapters are devoted to safety during operation. The first
chapter, Chapter 4: Safe Operation (What?), describes in detail
the main requirements
relating to safety during operation concerning prevention, monitoring
and action.
The second chapter devoted to safety during operation,
Chapter 5: Safe operation (How?) shows how nuclear power plants
meet the safety requirements and prove that safety is guaranteed
(compliance of operating methods and the installations with safety
requirements).
Control of safety during operation is a matter of
"actually obtaining, and proving it to the general public and
the Safety Authority, true compliance of the operating methods and
installations with the safety requirements, while maintaining the
competitiveness of the electric production". This definition
is derived from Nuclear Power Plant Operations Safety
Policy documents.
The safety requirements are both regulatory and associated
with the design and operating feedback from the plants. The latter
are specified in the General Operating Rules, the On-Site Emergency
Plan, and the In-service Inspection Rules for Mechanical Components
of PWR Nuclear Island.
The General Operating Rules is an interface document
between design and operation. A series of rules is established specific
to the operation the unit which must comply with the requirements
to stay within the scope of the safety elements presented in the
Safety Analysis Report.
Following startup, equipment and procedures of units
undergo a permanent process of modification.
This continuous process has the disadvantage of making
the safety level of the unit difficult to assess. The level of safety
depends naturally on the state of progress of modification work.
A rapid rate of change in the installations could increase the operating
errors. Applicable safety requirements must be clearly defined and
must not undergo constant revisions in order to efficiently manage
the safety of the units. The practice of grouping modifications
satisfies this requirement.
The process of safety reexamination, introduced in
the French regulations (Decree dated 11 December 1963 and modified
on 19 January 1990), offers the opportunity of clarifying the relationship
between the implementation status and safety requirements.
This reexamination essentially consists of:
- Clarification of the frame
of reference of the safety
requirements consisting of the various rules, criteria, and specifications
applicable to a standardized series
- Appraisals of the conformance of the
units to these requirements by reevaluating
safety studies, when the proof in the initial Safety Analysis
Report appears to be inadequate, as well as reviews to check the
condition of the equipment, systems and barriers
- An assessment of the frame
of reference in the light of new studies or occurrences
and more recent reference material; this may lead to a change
in the frame of reference when safety considerations clearly outweigh
any negative effects of the modifications
Any modifications resulting from the reexamination
will be implemented in batches during ten-year inspections. This
is a general rule.
Therefore:
should occur every 10 years (barring major safety
problems).
|